Blog : Posts from August 2007 : Page 2

*

The weather

In which we can see the weather coming


You know it’s going to be hot and sticky when it’s still only half-seven in the morning and you can already see the inversion layer.

Inversion layer: when warm air gets trapped under colder. It lies, stagnant. You can see it, because it fills up with trapped smoke and muck and pollution. Even in the countryside, it sticks like a brown haze.

When you see that, you know it’s going to be a nasty, sticky day.

No comments yet. »

Keyword noise: , , , , , ,

*

Advice

In which we pass something on


Do not forward this email.

If you do not forward this email, nothing bad will happen to you. No terrible ancient email curses will be unleashed.

If you do forward this email, your wish will not come true. You will not receive unexpected love, or come into some money.

If you do forward this email, the missing child will not be found. Noone will break any world records. Bill Gates will not send any money to charity. Luck will not come your way.

This is not a virus, and there has never been any virus of this name. A websearch could have told you that. So don’t tell everyone in your address book about it.

Pass this information on to everyone you know.

No comments yet. »

Keyword noise: , , , , , , ,

*

A Big Splash (Or, Films I’ve Never Seen, Part One)

In which we wonder what the film-makers were thinking


Every time I’ve been to the cinema recently, I’ve had to sit through a trailer for newly-released film Evan Almighty. And it makes me slightly uneasy. Because – if you’re lucky enough to have managed to avoid the thing – it’s a lighthearted family comedy based on the story of Noah And The Flood, from Genesis. God comes down to Earth, visits an innocent politician, and tells him to build an ark because he’s decided to do the whole flood thing again.

Read that again. It’s a lighthearted family comedy, where God comes down to visit a politician, because (going on what happened last time) he wants to warn him that everyone else on the planet is going to be killed in the biggest natural disaster you can imagine. Did anyone even think at all about this film before it was made? Did they get beyond “comedy, sequel, some Bible story that everyone vaguely remembers”?* To my mind, the idea of writing a comedy about God breaking the only promise he ever made to the whole of mankind,** and apparently planning to kill everyone on earth apart from an American politician, is a little … well, perverse.***

I assume – not having seen the film – that not everyone (apart from the blessed family) gets killed at the end. Surely no Hollywood studio is going to release a big summer comedy where everyone on earth apart from a handful of people dies at the end? Drama, maybe, but not comedy. All in all, it sounds like a bit of a mess. Does God turn out to be nice in the end? Does he say: “Aw, I was only kidding. I just wanted you to learn how to be a better person.” How many people are killed by the flood that I did spot in the trailer? I really don’t want to find out.

* Although most people forget the bit at the end where Noah gets drunk, and one of his sons is forever cursed for seeing his drunken father’s tadger.

** Because it – the promise that “I’m not going to kill you all ever again” – was made before the Tower of Babel incident, when God scrambles everyone’s brains and makes possible the Tourist Phrasebook – so, as everyone was rather samey, there wasn’t any one Chosen People. And he never does kill everyone all together again – after that, he limits himself to smiting one city at a time.

*** And not in the good way

No comments yet. »

Keyword noise: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

*

Appetite

In which things are described systematically


I’ve not been too well again, hence the gap in posting. No energy, no get-up-and-go, no appetite.

I eventually dragged myself to the computer to check my RSS reader, thought, and my appetite came back. Because, courtesy of Informationally Overloaded, I read A Sketch Towards a Taxonomy of Meta-Desserts.* Hurrah! At last, someone has invented a systematic way to describe pudding. My appetite came back straight away, and I started raiding the freezer. Must read that blog more at some point – preferably just after I’ve eaten, not just before.

In other news: thanks to Feather Boa for solving my telly-related puzzle from the other day. I would have noticed sooner, but her comment was in the queue and I didn’t spot it until now. Bah. Thank you!

* I particularly like the URL, too

No comments yet. »

Keyword noise: , ,

*

Search this site

*

Contact

E: feedback [at] symbolicforest [dot] com

IM: Ask me if you'd like to know

*

Post Categories

Artistic (115)
Dear Diary (342)
Feeling Meh (48)
Geekery (108)
In With The Old (32)
Linkery (37)
Media Addict (157)
Meta (74)
Photobloggery (92)
Political (112)
Polling (7)
Sub category (19)
The Family (30)
The Office (70)
Unbelievable (51)
*

Previously, on Symbolic Forest...

July 2010 (3)
June 2010 (11)
May 2010 (16)
April 2010 (2)
February 2010 (2)
January 2010 (15)
September 2009 (3)
August 2009 (6)
July 2009 (10)
June 2009 (10)
May 2009 (16)
April 2009 (18)
March 2009 (20)
February 2009 (22)
January 2009 (24)
December 2008 (26)
November 2008 (18)
October 2008 (1)
August 2008 (1)
July 2008 (4)
June 2008 (4)
May 2008 (10)
April 2008 (11)
March 2008 (10)
February 2008 (11)
January 2008 (15)
December 2007 (17)
November 2007 (14)
October 2007 (17)
September 2007 (13)
August 2007 (14)
July 2007 (14)
June 2007 (17)
May 2007 (15)
April 2007 (19)
March 2007 (18)
February 2007 (19)
January 2007 (29)
December 2006 (21)
November 2006 (17)
October 2006 (19)
September 2006 (20)
August 2006 (25)
July 2006 (26)
June 2006 (23)
May 2006 (24)
April 2006 (24)
March 2006 (23)
February 2006 (23)
January 2006 (31)
December 2005 (25)
November 2005 (27)
October 2005 (29)
September 2005 (30)
August 2005 (5)